All NewsEconomy News

A new lawsuit filed with California Watchdog accuses Theresa Taylor, a member of the CalPERS board of directors, of perjury for filing false statements hiding more than $ 30,000 in income; Fines imposed on Jones chairman for campaign violations

Individuals in greenhouses shouldn’t throw stones. We’ve got reported how CalPERS is engaged in what Pulitzer Prize winner Mike Hiltzik has known as a "witch hunt" in opposition to board member Margaret Brown by limiting her means to carry out her duties on grounds Nonetheless, he ignored an obvious crime amongst his personal. the members of the board of administrators, on this case Theresa Taylor, vice-chair of the board of administrators of CalPERS and chair of the funding committee.

As we are going to present, Taylor violated California's necessities for California authorities to report all revenue and belongings acquired from non-government sources inside their jurisdiction. Particularly, Taylor hid no less than $ 30,00zero in revenue that she acquired as vice-president / secretary-treasurer of SEIU 1000 from 2016 to 2018.

Taylor didn’t disclose this revenue on the Honest Political Practices Fee Type 700, a disclosure of financial pursuits, which is a sworn kind underneath penalty of perjury. Perjury is a criminal offense in California. Taylor declared himself unfit to proceed performing his duties by this repeated and willful violation.

Failure to report such a big and simply documented source of revenue additionally raises the query of whether or not Taylor didn’t report another revenue. For instance, the FPPC requires California authorities officers to report presents over $ 50. Did Taylor obtain live performance tickets or meals, or pay journey or lodge bills for California pursuits that she additionally didn’t report ?

And Taylor is much from the one member of the CalPERS board to flout the FPPC guidelines. Former chairman of the board, Priya Mathur, was a serial offender, repeatedly submitting 700 kinds and marketing campaign disclosure kinds very late. FPPC commissioners even took the bizarre step of accelerating a 2014 advantageous that was significantly greater than what legislation enforcement personnel had really helpful due to his repeat offense.

The FPPC additionally fined the chairman of the board, Henry Jones. From April 2020 (italics within the unique):

Within the Henry Jones case for CalPERS 2015 and Henry Jones; FPPC n ° 18/109. Workers: Theresa Gilbertson, Fee counsel and Patricia Ballantyne, program specialist. The respondents had been represented by Leilani Rudow Beaver and Joseph Guardarrama from the Kaufman Authorized Group. This query arises from two obligatory audits by the Honest Political Practices Fee. Henry Jones was a profitable candidate representing retired members of the Board of Administrators of the California Public Staff & # 39; Retirement System ("CalPERS"). Henry Jones for CalPERS 2015 was its candidate-controlled committee. The Committee and Jones signed an settlement to impose the limitation interval, efficient March 27, 2020. On April 7, 2015, the Committee and Jones didn’t open a separate committee and marketing campaign checking account for the nomination de Jones, no later than April 7, 2015, in violation of Articles 84101, 85201 of the Authorities Code and of Regulation 18521 (1 depend). Good: $ 2,00zero.

Sadly, FPPC fines are usually small beer.

Proof that Theresa Taylor dedicated perjury by failing to reveal her revenue for years

Under is affirmation from former CalPERS board member and former California State Staff Affiliation president JJ ​​Jelincic of his criticism concerning Theresa Taylor.

From: Group-wide criticism
Despatched: Tuesday, June 30, 2020, 2:45 p.m. 26 sec PDT
Topic: Affirmation of the submission of a criticism to the FPPC

We’ve got acquired your criticism.

For future reference, the criticism quantity is: COM-06302020-01129 and the respondents listed on the criticism are: Taylor.

In case you have filed a sworn criticism, we are going to notify you of our deliberate motion in roughly 14 days.

If, nonetheless, you haven’t filed a criticism underneath oath, you may comply with up on the decision of your criticism through our web site at

After getting submitted your criticism, you may test the standing of the criticism by emailing your criticism affirmation quantity to


Jelincic despatched me the textual content of his criticism, which is a public doc and might be obtained by the legislation on public paperwork:

Theresa Taylor is a member of the CalPERS Board of Administrators and a brochure 87200.

In early 2017, 2018 and 2019, she filed Type 700 protecting the 2016, 2017 and 2018 calendar years. She didn’t disclose the revenues of SEIU Native 1000.

A Type 700 clearly requires the disclosure of revenue on Schedule C. Every of those kinds incorporates the next:

I’ve used all due diligence to arrange this assertion. I’ve examined this declaration and, to one of the best of my information, the knowledge contained on this doc and within the hooked up annexes is true and full. I acknowledge that it is a public doc.

I certify underneath penalty of perjury underneath the legal guidelines of the State of California that the above is true and proper.

Provided that she has not reported revenue for 3 years in a row, this might recommend not solely "due diligence" failure however deliberate withholding of data.

Contemplating all the following information, it’s unlikely that she won’t know the place the additional cash is.
in financial institution accounts got here from:

• As a member of the board of administrators of SEIU 1000, it voted on the allowances of the leaders,

• As secretary-treasurer of SEIU 1000, she knew that the native paid the officers' allowances (together with herself),

• As the pinnacle of tax compliance for the Franchise Tax Board, she knew that the remuneration for the service was revenue, and

• Because the beneficiary of a year-end kind, she was knowledgeable that she had acquired revenue.

Under is proof of Taylor's revenue from SEIU. These are the degrees set for 2016, beginning in July; do not forget that Taylor was in put up all through the 2016, 2017 and first half of 2018 calendar. Her allocation field is the place the road "Vice-president-treasurer" and column D "Officers proposed SEIU
Annual assembly on wages ”, for $ 16,708.

00 2016-étatwide-officier-allowance-proposition-v1

Take out a calculator. Assuming that the allowance was not elevated for the 2017-2018 fiscal yr, Taylor acquired $ 16,708 x 2, or $ 33,416 (his allowance has solely began as of July 2016; in 2018, she was in workplace just for the primary six months) .2 We displayed Taylor Type 700 for the 2016 calendar under.

You may see that she has not accomplished Schedule C, that’s, she ought to have reported revenue from SEIU 1000. You may see right here that She omitted Appendix C from her utility and in addition did not file and disclose SEIU 1000 revenue in 2017 and 2018. Word that Taylor later modified her 2017 kind so as to add the receipt donation revenue.

It’s also telling that CalPERS not too long ago eliminated Type 700 from its web site board and solely restored it after submitting a request underneath the Public Information Act. Undoubtedly, they acknowledged that I supposed to publish them, so that they appeared to have restored the 700 types of council members in an effort to stop bare capitalism from turning into an much more useful resource. vital on CalPERS that it’s not already.

Jelincic's closing factors vitiate any try to defend Taylor.

There is no such thing as a manner SEIU has not despatched Taylor and the IRS a report on the revenues it has acquired; the group can be in a ton of sizzling water if it fails to ship the required revenue paperwork to leaders and the IRS.

There is no such thing as a manner that Taylor, as a tax compliance officer, may declare that she didn’t perceive that revenue is revenue

There is no such thing as a manner that Taylor can credibly make a lame excuse, as if she doesn’t perceive that SEIU 1000 was not a authorities company when she sat on its board of administrators. ;administration

Please ship an e mail to the editor of your native newspaper and TV channel about this double commonplace, of CalPERS tolerating repeated abuse of disclosure and marketing campaign funding legal guidelines, on this case reaching a criminal offense underneath obvious perjury whereas waging a struggle of harassment and fabricated abuse in opposition to its sole member of the accountability board Margaret Brown. At a minimal, ask that Taylor be faraway from the funding committee, as she can’t belief the numbers, and that she get replaced by Brown.

Ship a duplicate to the Chairman of the CalPERS Board of Administrators, Henry Jones, and to the heads of the California legislative committees that oversee pensions:

Senator Richard Pan

Deputy Freddie Rodriguez

And please additionally unfold this message to CalPERS beneficiaries and California taxpayers. Thanks!

1 As we’ve described in an extended kind, and this was confirmed within the feedback, the issue was the alleged misuse of the title CalPERS by Brown within the context of his Twitter account, even when different present and former members of the board of administrators did the identical with out being sanctioned. Hiltzik defined in his column why the usage of Brown, having a transparent, reputable and disclosed relationship with CalPERS, and that it was not used to promote a services or products, wasn’t 39 was not in opposition to California legislation, as CalPERS wrongly asserted. CalPERS additionally invoked trademark and copyright infringements, that are additionally unlikely. A single phrase can’t be protected by copyright. And to have a defendable mental property declare, CalPERS ought to have persistently and proactively pursued the allegations of abuse, which it fatally undermined by permitting Brown to have his Twitter account for ten- eight months and never asking the numerous different CalPERS and non-CalPERS members who put "CalPERS" into their Twitter handles to chop it out.

2 For you, pricey readers who’ve seen that the board is just a proposal, relaxation assured that we even have a duplicate of a screenshot of the SEIU1000Employees website, with the 39; announcement in 2016 that the board of administrators had voted the proposed allocations. I’d be pleased to ahead the picture to anybody . The textual content at its starting:

June 29, 2016 David Bouilly
Profitable native exec 1000 grants

In a message from DLC 781 President Latreece Smith, the Native 1000 Board (since 2014, legally known as the Board of Administrators) adopted a compensation package deal for the Native 1000 govt workers who should enter efficient instantly.

00 2016 Taylor Declaration of Financial Pursuits
Printable version, PDF and e-mail
Source Link

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker